Performance evaluation of air-source heat pump based on a pressure drop embedded model

Highlights

• An air source heat pump model including the model of evaporator and condenser pressure drop is developed.

• The iterative simulation approach is based on the equalization of LMTD computed using two different methods.

• The developed model is well validated based on the reference data source.

• The effects of R-32, R-410A and R-290 refrigerants on pressure drop and performance have been evaluated.

Abstract

An air-source heat pump simulation model, accounting for evaporator and condenser pressure drop, has been developed. The model is capable of computing the heat pump's coefficient of performance (COP) under different ambient temperatures and relative humidities above frosting conditions. This research extends an existing iterative simulation method that relies on the equalization of logarithmic mean temperature differences (LMTDs) calculated through two different approaches by adding a pressure drop simulation. Frictional and acceleration pressure drop is considered, computed iteratively. Simulation results for three different refrigerants, R410A, R32 and R290, are compared. The model's accuracy is validated by comparing simulated COP values with measured COP values from the reference heat pump datasheet. The model closely replicates the measured COP values above frosting conditions, with only a slight underestimation of approximately 1.5%. Results show a substantial impact of ambient temperature on the COP. For instance, an ambient temperature of 20 ^◦C, compared to 7 ^◦C, results in a COP increase of up to 35%, while an ambient temperature of −10 ^◦C leads to a 26% reduction in COP. Relative humidity enhances the COP if air moisture condensation becomes possible. Higher condenser capacities negatively affect the COP. The study highlights the differences in pressure drop characteristics between the condenser and the evaporator for the modeled heat pump, with maximum pressure drops of 220 kPa and 50 kPa for the condenser and evaporator, respectively. Additionally, the choice of refrigerant significantly influences pressure drop, with R32 displaying the lowest pressure drop, R410A showing the highest condenser pressure drop, and R290 causing the highest evaporator pressure drop.